| Name |
Comments |
| 1955) |
|
Scottie Hayes  |
| hRobertWalkers2001(at)hotmail(dot)com |
Location: - |
|
Your place is valueble for me. Thanks!…
|
| 1954) |
|
Valeria_Wisconsin  |
| hagg(dot)e(dot)r(dot)ston(dot)p(dot)e(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
Honestly said, I don't think you can do anything to fend off the attacks. I don't think you got attacked because of something you did, but because lots of people admire you and your work. That's apparently enough for some people to hate you. Only by unpassionating your readers, can you hope to actually stop the haters. I hope you will reject that option.
|
| 1953) |
|
Kimberly_Vermont  |
| h(dot)a(dot)g(dot)g(dot)erst(dot)o(dot)n(dot)per(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
Only reason I voted for him was SARAH. I wasn’t even going to vote until he picked her. I had voted in every election since the late 1960?s.
|
| 1952) |
|
Violet Strong  |
| vShyendSanchezc1956(at)hotmail(dot)com |
Location: - |
|
very nice post, i certainly love this website, keep on it
|
| 1951) |
|
Naomi_Pennsylvania  |
| ha(dot)gg(dot)er(dot)st(dot)onp(dot)er(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
One condition would be that the groupblog would adopt your style. Similar to how the headfirst books have the same style but different writers. If you join the 37signals blog where you put up highly visual articles, in a see of more textual posts, you will still stand out.
|
| 1950) |
|
Madeline_Vermont  |
| h(dot)a(dot)g(dot)g(dot)e(dot)r(dot)s(dot)to(dot)n(dot)p(dot)e(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list…..perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!
|
| 1949) |
|
Evelyn_Iowa  |
| h(dot)a(dot)g(dot)g(dot)er(dot)st(dot)o(dot)n(dot)per(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
The reality is that the establishment in the Senate HATE CCB, modest as it really is and see the new Boehner plan as an out, since they figure they will get Reid to make a compromise since it is only 22 Billion in cuts.
|
| 1948) |
|
Leah_New_York  |
| ha(dot)g(dot)ger(dot)s(dot)t(dot)on(dot)p(dot)e(dot)r(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay.
|
| 1947) |
|
Destiny_New_Hampshire  |
| h(dot)a(dot)g(dot)g(dot)e(dot)rs(dot)tonper(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
It makes sense about not continuing with "business as usual" — I couldn't do it, either. But I can't see ghost writing as being satisfiying for someone with as strong a voice as yours. Being an evangelist for the likes of Apple or Adobe might be cool, but would that let you continue with the stream of consciousness riffs that have obviously been satifsying for you — and been so energizing for us, your readers? Don't know.
|
| 1946) |
|
Caroline_Oregon  |
| hagge(dot)rs(dot)t(dot)o(dot)n(dot)per(at)gmail(dot)com |
Location: Uzbekistan |
|
I think that you'd probably do well in a consulting role where you are helping companies who want to improve in the area of creating passionate users (products and websites). Your knowledge of the field is shown well by your blogging, and maybe getting out in front of people will give you more of a reason to stay passionate about this subject area (if not the blog itself).
|